Sunday, September 8, 2024
HomePoliticMcGill withdraws injunction request against pro-Palestinian groups

McGill withdraws injunction request against pro-Palestinian groups


McGill University has withdrawn its injunction request against pro-Palestinian groups, CBC News has learned.

The request sought a court order to remove an encampment on its downtown campus in Montreal.

Earlier this month, the university hired a private security firm to evict the protesters anyway.

A case management hearing was scheduled Thursday morning at the Montreal courthouse, but McGill’s lawyers were not present.

The proceeding was suspended and court documents filed shortly afterward by the law firm Fasken Martineau DuMoulin, which has been representing McGill, provided notice to the court about the withdrawal.

Two people involved in the case also said the university does not intend to set a new court date.

McGill did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

University sought to have encampment banned

The university made the request May 15, roughly three weeks after a pro-Palestinian encampment was set up on the lower lawn of its downtown campus and after another injunction request filed on behalf of two McGill students had been rejected.

After McGill’s provisional injunction request was also rejected, the university announced it would be moving forward with a request for an interlocutory injunction, the next stage as it sought to have the encampment permanently banned.

WATCH | Who has the right to occupy campus space?: 

Was it legal for McGill to take down the pro-Palestinian encampment?

While McGill argues it had a right to remove protesters and their belongings from its private property after a 10-week encampment, some legal experts argue it’s not that simple.

The school wanted to have protesters barred from “camping or occupying in any manner whatsoever” as well as from protesting in any way that is in violation of university policy on its downtown campus.

The order would also have authorized bailiffs tasked with serving the judgment to “call upon any peace officer to assist them.”

The court documents filed Thursday withdrawing the request as a whole were brief and provided no reason for the withdrawal.



Source link

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments